Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Migrant Death Rate on Arizona Border More than Double in Two Years While DHS Plans Expansion of Deadly Criminalization Policies

For Immediate Release
January 24, 2012
Contact: Kat Rodriguez: 520.770.1373


Arizona- Despite continued claims by the Department of Homeland Security that the number of migrant deaths has reached an all-time low, data show that the actual rate of migrant death on the Arizona border has actually almost doubled in the last two years. This information comes as DHS announces plans to eliminate voluntary removals and criminally prosecute, incarcerate, and formally deport all apprehended immigrants, a move that is clearly spurred by the need to boost detention numbers to justify a grossly bloated DHS budget.


While apprehension numbers do not provide an exact number of immigrants attempting to cross the border, academic research has illustrated that apprehension are highly correlated and fluctuate with true unauthorized migration flows (1). Using the numbers of U.S. Border Patrol apprehensions as a proxy for migration flow, along with the number of human remains recovered on the border, we are able to generate an approximate "migrant death rate."


As a point of comparison, in 2009, the number of recovered human remains of those believed to be border crossers was 183. The number of apprehensions reported by the Border Patrol in the Tucson sector was 241,673. Thus, it can be said that for every 100,000 apprehensions, there were 75.72 human remains recovered on the Arizona border.

In 2011, the number of recovered human remains of border crossers was also 183. However, reported apprehensions for the Tucson sector dropped dramatically that year, to 123,285. Ultimately, for every 100,000 apprehensions, the remains of 148.43 migrants were recovered; nearly double the rate of 2009.


Since 2000, the remains of more than 2,300 migrants have been recovered on the Arizona, and at least 6,000 border-wide. The continued policies of criminalization of working men and women, coupled with the strategy of funneling migration further into the harsh Arizona desert, has resulted in a human rights crisis that has been denounced by local, national, and international communities.


Claiming credit for the decrease in migration, which is in fact the result of the poor economy, DHS's plan to dramatically increase the criminalization of migrant workers is irresponsible. Such a policy will ultimately result in forcing more people through non-regularized forms of migration while boosting the budgets of private detention centers such as CCA and contracted companies such as Geo Group, whose budgets depend specifically on the criminalization, detention and deportation of migrants, and who have long been included in the biggest lobbyists for longer and harsher sentencing for immigrants.


The failure of the Obama Administration to acknowledge the impact of deadly border policies and the appalling position of increasing the enforcement regime is reprehensible. In this heated election year, it is particularly insulting to Latino families that political leaders jockey to outdo each other on anti-immigrant and blatantly anti-Mexican rhetoric, while at the same time strategize on how to secure the Latino vote. Democrats and Republicans alike should be advised that this hypocrisy has not gone unnoticed by Latino communities, and they can expect no less than to harvest what the seeds of their xenophobia and racism will yield them.


Currently, the number of remains recovered in Arizona from October through December of 2011 is 45, already exceeding of the number recovered last year during the same timeframe. 82% are currently unidentified. 55% are of unknown gender, meaning that not enough of their bodies were recovered to establish gender. 73% are skeletal remains, a result of the federal border strategy of forcing them into the most isolated and remote areas of the border. While Arizona continues to be viewed as a "battleground state" by political and economic forces, the real battle is being waged around the issue of dignity and justice, with human beings as the casualties of greed and division.


  1. Espenshade, Thomas J. (1995b). "Unauthorized Immigration to the United States." Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 21, Pp. 195-216.

The complete list of recovered remains is available on the Coalición de Derechos Humanos website: http://www.derechoshumanosaz.net. This information is available to anyone who requests it from us and is used by our organization to further raise awareness of the human rights crisis we are facing on our borders.

###


Coalición de Derechos Humanos
P.O. Box 1286 Tucson, AZ 85702
Tel: 520.770.1373
Fax: 520.770.7455
www.derechoshumanosaz.net

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, January 04, 2012

Deported, disoriented, forgotten

Published by The Phnom Penh Post
January 3, 2011
By Diana Montaño

Sam Bath isn’t sure exactly where he’s from. All his mother told him is that he was born “somewhere near the Thai border” before the family fled Cambodia and resettled in the United States as refugees in 1986.


Now, the 37-year-old slouches in a plastic chair in the office of the Returnee Integration Support Centre in Phnom Penh, a city he had never set foot in until two US immigration agents escorted him off a commercial airliner on December 2 and handed him over to Cambodian authorities.

“My mind, my heart is over there,” he says of Fresno, California, the city he grew up in, and where all his closest relatives, including two adolescent sons, live.

After being granted asylum from the atrocities of the Khmer Rouge and living most of his life in the US, Sam Bath was deported to a homeland he barely knows, amidst an unprecedented immigration crackdown in the US last year.

In October, the US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) reported that 396,906 individuals were removed from the US during Fiscal Year 2011 – the highest number in the agency’s history.

Sam Bath is one of 87 individuals repatriated to Cambodia, according to the US Embassy. While it’s a tiny portion of all US deportations, it is a more than fourfold increase from 2010, when only 21 people were repatriated, according to RISC. Last year marked the highest number since the US started deporting Cambodians after the Repatriation Agreement was signed in 2002.

For the last month, Sam Bath has been living in limbo at the temporary shelter operated by RISC, the only local NGO dedicated to assisting returnees. He’s unsure of what to do or where to go, and unable to make any moves.

“Right now I’m just waiting for my paperwork. I need an ID, I need my family book,” he says, referring to the Cambodian government-issued document in which individuals are registered as members of a family as proof of residence. Without the “family book” he can’t apply for ID, and without ID, he can’t buy something as simple as a SIM card, let alone apply for a job, rent a flat, or open a bank account. But like most refugees whose communities were shattered by the violence they escaped, Sam Bath has no family to speak of.

“My mum tried to look for some sisters, but she doesn’t know where they are, [or] if they’re still alive,” he says.

Since no relative could sign for his release at immigration, RISC staff “sponsored” him. Once released, they offered him shelter at their office, and are now helping him with his paperwork.

He has no idea how long it will take, but is grateful to have a roof over his head.

If not for RISC, “I don’t know where I would have gone. I’d probably be out there”, he says, pointing to the street.

The drastic surge in repatriations this year, however, has begun to strain the already meagre support system for returnees in Cambodia.

“There is much more need this year,” says Kao Sarith, senior case manager at RISC, which opened in 2002 as the Returnee Assistance Program. Its goal was to ease returnees’ transition to an unfamiliar country and culture by providing shelter, food, and orientation.

Immigration authorities notify RISC staff when a returnee is scheduled to arrive so that they can do a needs assessment. Kao Sarith says that in past years, three to six people would arrive in one month, sometimes fewer. Last month there were 12.

Deportable refugees
Sean McIntosh, a public affairs officer for the US Embassy here, is hesitant to attribute the spike in repatriations to an increase in arrests or deportations. Rather, he says, it is “a reflection of having an ICE representative in Cambodia with a permanent presence”, something which has allowed for “better processing of ICE cases” in recent years.

But advocates in the US familiar with the issue of Cambodian deportations are quick to point to a shift in enforcement strategy on the part of the Obama administration as the cause. “I think it has to do with the [2012 presidential] campaign,” says Jacqueline Dan, staff attorney with the Asian Pacific American Legal Centre in Los Angeles.

Dan says that amidst escalating criticism from immigrant rights groups in the US regarding heightened deportations, the Obama Administration has expressly shifted its priorities to removing individuals with criminal records, as revealed in an ICE memo leaked last June. This move aimed to appease critics while at the same time positioning the administration to look tough on immigration enforcement, she explains.

The shift has had a significant impact on deportable Cambodian refugees, says Dan. Khmer youths are more susceptible to getting into trouble with the law and falling into the category of a deportable “criminal alien”, she explains. “First you have the Khmer Rouge targeting basically anyone that they think is educated. That wipes out a huge percentage of people who might successfully adjust to life in the United States.”

On top of that, she says, most refugees who fled the Khmer Rouge did so after witnessing, and living through, atrocities. “A lot of them came to the US and were traumatised ... but were not provided services that they really needed.”

These factors, combined with the poverty most refugees faced after resettlement in low-income, racially stratified neighbourhoods, severely impacted Khmer youth, many of whom joined street gangs or became involved in criminal activity. “They grew up poor, they grew up in families that were somewhat broken and they found another community there that supported them, that protected them, where they found self-worth.

“And so that’s where, when you look at these policy shifts within the [Obama] administration, you see certain communities getting hit harder than others,” she says. APALC hasn’t seen a similar spike in deportation of, for example, Filipino or Korean undocumented immigrants, she says, adding that there are now about 2,000 Cambodians with final deportation orders in the United States.

“I got thrown into the ghetto,” says Mout Iv, a 34 year-old year old whose refugee family resettled in South Philadelphia when he was a child. “Over there, Blacks, Hispanics and Asians don’t mix.” When Mout Iv joined an Asian gang in his teens, it was as much to “fit in and be down with the homeboys”, as it was for protection.

In 1998, he was arrested for “stabbing a black guy” and served five years in prison. Mout Iv says that when he got out of prison in 2003, he was fully rehabilitated. He opened up his own barbershop. He bought two properties. He started a family. “I did everything I was supposed to do,” he says. Then, in 2010 he was he was asked to report to ICE. Instead of a regular check-in with the agency, he was detained for eight months with no warning and finally deported last May.

In Phnom Penh, Kout Iv sticks out. He wears a striped red and white polo shirt, a red Phillies baseball cap and shiny black Nikes. He still walks with that dropped-hip swagger unique to American inner cities.

“We’re not bad people,” he says of himself and fellow returnees. “We made bad choices when we were younger.”

Kout considers himself blessed, having found a job teaching two weeks after arriving thanks to a connection through his Philadelphia minister. He now teaches Kindergarteners English, and rents a small flat for US$60 a month. Though he is getting by in Phnom Penh, his family in Philadelphia is struggling.

His girlfriend, a nurse, was left to take care of their 18-month-old daughter, and is now struggling to make ends meet without his support. Though they were able to rent out the barbershop, the tenant is now two months behind, making the family fall behind on their mortgage payments. Selling off one or both of the family’s properties is not a viable option given the depressed state of the real estate market in the US.

A few weeks after arriving, Kout Iv signed up for English teaching certification classes through RISC. He took his certification exam two weeks ago, and is hoping that the certificate will allow him to get a better-paying teaching job to help support his family.

Integration
Kout Iv is an inspiring case, but a rare exception. Returnees, the majority of whom did not finish high school in the US and have few marketable skills, have a difficult time adjusting to life in Cambodia.

According to a 2008 survey conducted by researchers from the University of Washington and the Royal University of Phnom Penh, out of 105 returnees, 52 per cent were unemployed, 34 per cent had no permanent housing and 65 per cent were unable to pay for basic needs.

This is why the services that RISC provides are so crucial.

But with only two full-time staff, the organisation is scrambling to keep up. In October, its main source of funding, a grant from USAID-funded East-West Management Institute, was reduced from $54,000 to $34,000, according to Song Oem, RISC’s finance officer and acting director. The combination of increased demand and decreased funding is forcing RISC to reduce the scope of its services.

Kao Sarith says that they have begun to ask returnees to pay for their own food after two weeks. Last year the organisation was able to reimburse $80 of the cost of a family book and birth certificates; this year they can only cover $40.

The total cost of documents can run from $150 to $200, though Kao Sarith says he has heard of returnees being charged as much as $400 by local authorities.

“They think they are rich because they come from the US,” he says. “So they charge them a lot of money.”

Culture shocked and disoriented, deportees are vulnerable to extortion from the moment they land in Cambodia. Many report being extorted by Cambodian immigration authorities. Agents told Sam Bath that he would have to pay for his paperwork if he wanted to be released, so he paid $50. Not wanting to cause trouble with local authorities, he didn’t even report the extortion to RISC. Kout Iv coughed up $200 and a “very big bag of rice” to get released.

These abuses are especially the case for returnees who do not have families to help them navigate the system. But even those who do have a family, mainly in the provinces, are sometimes taken advantage of.

Kao Sarith says that extended family members often receive money on a returnee’s behalf. “When they’re cut off, and their family [in the US] stops sending money, they’re kicked out,” he says.

Most returnees who resettle in the countryside go to Battambang, and field visits are a critical component of RISC’s outreach to ensure that deportees are adjusting well. But this work, too, has been reduced recently. Whereas staff used to conduct field visits every month, this year they had to reduce them to every two months, Kao Sarith said.

An even greater challenge is meeting the needs of returnees with special needs, such as those with substance abuse or serious mental health problems. “Mental illness is very difficult,” he says. “For those with mental illnesses, even if they have family, the families don’t receive them.”

A few weeks ago, RISC staff had to deal with a mentally unstable returnee who ran back to the airport with his luggage and a blank piece of paper he claimed to be his passport, demanding to be flown to the US. RISC staff had to spend the night with him at the airport until he calmed down. Because of virtually non-existent mental health services in Cambodia, the man is now staying at the RISC office, but Kao Sarith admits that staff is ill prepared to deal with such cases.

Last year, RISC was able to provide families hosting returnees with mental illnesses $20 to cover medicine and transportation and food for medical visits, but this year they have no money left for it, says Kao Sarith.

Fundraising is an uphill battle, since most donors are hesitant to give to an organisation that works almost exclusively with individuals who have criminal pasts.

“When funders hear that returnees got deported because of criminal backgrounds, they don’t want to work with them,” he says.

Sam Bath, the recent RISC arrival still waiting for an ID to be issued, became “deportable” after being convicted for pulling out what he says was an unloaded gun during an altercation with a neighbour. He served six-and-a-half months in prison, and then, on the same day he was released, he was picked up by immigration agents without being told what was happening and taken to a detention centre in another state. He was deported five months later.

He is hopeful that he’ll be able to start a new life in Cambodia, but without any support, he is unsure of how to make that happen. Sam Bath says he is thinking of teaching English, and is hoping to take the same English certification classes Mout Iv was able to sign up for a few months ago, but these, too, are in danger of being cut.

Lamenting the lack of attention given to returnees by both governments, Sam Bath compares the situation to that of a plant that doesn’t get watered.

“You can’t take [a plant] from over there and put it here,” he explains. “When there’s no one to take care of it, it’s gonna die.”

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

U.S. Immigrant Rights Groups Urge An End to Detentions & Deportations, Cite High Human Cost to Immigrant Families


For Immediate Release
December 15, 2011



Contact:
Colin Rajah 510-465-1984 ext. 306

Laura Rivas 510-465-1984 ext. 304

On International Migrants Day, December 18

U.S. Immigrant Rights Groups Urge An End to Detentions & Deportations, Cite High Human Cost to Immigrant Families

(Oakland, CA) As we approach International Migrants Day (December 18), U.S. immigrant rights groups urge the U.S. government to take immediate measures to end the detention and deportation of immigrant women, men and children, and its subsequent high human cost.

2011 marked a record year of deportations, coupled with ongoing detentions that separate and destabilize families and undermine community health, most recently highlighted by the DOJ's scathing report of Maricopa County's systemic human rights violations and DHS's decision to suspend 287(g) in the county.



“Despite the Obama Administration’s claims that they are only deporting so-called dangerous criminals, we witnessed the most deportations ever in the history of the U.S., including a record number of un-accompanied minors and long-term residents who are prosecuted for illegal re-entry,” declared Catherine Tactaquin, Executive Director of the National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (NNIRR). “Until there is an end to these punitive enforcement programs and practices, and concrete steps are taken toward durable solutions to regularize the status of undocumented immigrants, our communities will experience another generation of oppression and hardship.”



Earlier this year, NNIRR released a human rights report, Injustice for All: Rise of the Immigration Control Regime,which documented long-standing human rights abuses through existing policies and practices, such as “Secure Communities,” that result in the vile persecution of immigrant families, workers and communities.



“The recent ICE raid at Shogun Buffet, an Asheville restaurant, resulting in the detention and possible deportation of a dozen immigrant workers shows the Obama Administration’s strategy of ‘smart enforcement’ is more of the same under the Bush Administration. It is shameful that the Administration continues these punitive policies that crush families, tear parents away from their children, and subject them to emotional and physical trauma,” stated Laura Rivas, co-author of the report.  “Every day this year, the U.S. commits grave human rights violations. By criminalizing an entire class of people due to their immigration status, perceived or real, our government has also made them more vulnerable to abuse, discrimination and economic exploitation.”



As this year’s International Migrants Day comes on the heels of the 5th Global Forum on Migration and Development (GFMD) in Geneva, Switzerland, NNIRR called attention for global governance to respond to the human rights crisis facing migrants around the world.



“The U.S. has now taken leadership within the GFMD process,” commented Colin Rajah of Migrants Rights International (MRI), which has been organizing parallel civil society forums and actions in conjunction to the GFMD, “But after half a decade of dialogue, it is time for action as we witness ever-worsening conditions for migrants around the globe. We urge the U.S. to set an example with relief for undocumented immigrants from persecution within the U.S. And the U.S. can play a stronger role in shaping global governance to protect the human rights of all migrants, regardless of status or their perceived economic value to a country.”



Celebrate International Migrants Day,
Ratify the Migrant Workers’ Convention

International Migrants Day was recognized by the United Nations in 2000 to commemorate the passage of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (commonly referred to as the Migrant Workers’ Convention) on December 18, 1990.

NNIRR is renewing its call to the U.S. to ratify this critical Convention and commit to ending punitive enforcement policies and practices.



NNIRR is also joining a global day of action against racism and for the rights of migrants, refugees and displaced people, in which dozens of actions are being taken up around the world.



Immigrant community groups around the U.S. are also marking International Migrants Day with marches, press conferences, candlelight vigils, cultural events, art-exhibits, film-screenings in cities such as Honolulu, HI; Tucson, AZ; Oakland, CA; Chicago, IL; Asheville, NC; and New York, NY.

To view a partial list of events as well as details and contact information,  click here.

Friday, December 09, 2011

Fighting for Climate Justice in South Africa: An Interview with Trevor Ngwan

Janis Rosheuvel is a NNIRR Board member and formerly director of Families for Freedom in New York.

By Janis H. Rosheuvel
December 5, 2011 | Posted in Environment , IndyBlog | Email this article
(Photo: Janis H. Rosheuvel)
(Photo: Janis H. Rosheuvel)
Trevor Ngwane is a long time South African activist and organizer. He currently serves as the national organizer of the Million Climate Jobs Campaign and is a Masters student at the University of KwaZulu Natal’s Centre for Civil Society. He was formerly a trade union organizer and led the Anti-Privatisation Forum and Soweto Electricity Crisis Committee. He is currently participating in events at the people’s space organized in Durban to mobilize civil society action for climate justice during COP 17.

Ngwane talked about how the campaign to find one million jobs in South Africa is an answer to the climate crisis that is currently unfolding around the world as well as the 25 percent unemployment rate in the country. He stressed the need to seize on ordinary people’s interest and lived experience to mobilize them for the struggle to achieve one million climate jobs. He puts the potential for a million climate jobs in the context of a hobbled neoliberal system and talks about what the movement to halt climate change can learn from South Africa’s liberation struggle.

Janis Rosheuvel: Why are you in Durban now during the 17th Conference (COP 17) of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)?

Trevor Ngwane: At the moment I am an organizer for the Million Climate Jobs Campaign. This is a campaign that started about three months ago. It was inspired by COP 17 coming here to South Africa. It’s an intervention, what I’d call a positive campaign, because instead of just moaning about climate change we are trying to come up with solutions. At the same time also we are trying to address the unemployed or the workers who are threatened by losing jobs because of the need to change production methods. Let’s say, a coal miner I’m sure is not happy now with everyone attacking coal, you know. In South Africa we can create a minimum of one million climate jobs to actually fight against climate change to reduce carbon emissions. So what we are here [in Durban] is to promote this campaign.

JR: What is a climate job and how is it different from other jobs? In particular how does it address the need for good quality jobs at just wages?

TN: The campaign is actually inspired by socialist thinkers, so we really want decent permanent jobs and we emphasize that they should be public sector driven. Because the public sector, the government, is less likely to kick people out [of work]. And also it is less motivated by profit. I am not saying that governments don’t dance to the music of profit, but at least we have got some kind of democratic controls over governments. So a climate job is a public sector driven job which aims to reduce carbon emissions and also help people adapt to the consequences of global warming and climate change.

JR: What industries would be impacted by generating one million climate jobs?

TN: In South Africa many people still don’t have electricity in their houses and even those who do have electricity their access is insecure due to commodification, people have to pay for electricity. So if you can’t pay they cut you off. Sometimes [the electricity company] installs pre-payment meters. So a climate job in that sector would involve a building/manufacturing solar panels using the power of the sun to actually generate electricity. At the moment in South Africa almost all our electricity is generated through burning coal. So we could create 100,000 jobs in six months if we just imported solar panels and installed them for people without electricity. We could also, install water geysers which are powered through solar energy. But our vision is that the whole house actually has clean energy. Of course going into the future we want to move away from coal powered energy all together. Also because South Africa is a sunny place we don’t have to import all our solar panels. We could also design solar panels which are more suitable to our conditions. We’ve got many young people sitting at home with a high school education we could train them in engineering design for that kind of technology: installing the solar panels, maintaining them, also educating them [about the reliability of solar energy]. You know, there is still this prejudice that solar power is not the best power, is not reliable.

(Photo: Janis H. Rosheuvel)
(Photo: Janis H. Rosheuvel)
JR: What is climate adaptation and how does it fit in with the Million Climate Jobs Campaign?

TN: Climate change means, the climate is going to change maybe in ways ways which are unpredictable, which are extreme, which are abrupt. So instead of having the rainy season where the rain goes on for three months, you might have all that rain coming down in two weeks. Now if it comes down in two weeks you’re going to have flooding, floods. So you have to anticipate that. So you could have a national disaster program in case there is flooding. In South Africa we have a lot of shacks—shantytowns, people who live in houses built with corrugated iron, all sorts of materials. So we could build houses for those people which are strong and can withstand floods. That’s adaptation.

JR: In the Untied Stated, President Obama has talked a lot about this notion of green jobs, but there is limited political will to make green jobs or the kinds of adaptations you are talking about happen there. Do you think the political will exists in South Africa for a Million Climate Jobs to Come to fruition?

TN: I think we have a better chance because we only got our independence literally from colonialism in the last 20 years. In fact, Nelson Mandela was released from jail in 1990 and then we had a new government in 1994 so we are 17 years on, so there is still that hope, that energy, that momentum that we want a better life. Also neoliberal policy which is commodification [about]—everything must be up for sale—that way of thinking is losing its power in the world. Especially with the 2008 economic recession where the same people who were saying government must keeps its hands off the economy were busy using government money, tax money, to bail out banks, so now it it’s acceptable for government to intervene decisively in the economy, so we’ve got that going for us.

JR: What is the continental impact of climate change likely to be?

TN: South Africa is one of the most advanced economies in Africa: we’ve got industry, we got good roads, almost a first world sector. Africa will suffer the most from climate change, and from the consequences of global warming. What happens is, we’re got the Sahara dessert, already expanding through desertification. And people are starting to migrate, what you call climate refugees. As you know, in South Africa, you get many people from north of the border here coming down. There was crisis in Zimbabwe. We’ve got more than three million Zimbabweans in South Africa. We’ve got many Mozambicans. You can call them economic refugees. But you also get people from the [Democratic Republic of] the Congo who are actually war refugees. With climate change, it’s just going to make things worse. You are going to have problems with food security, as people have less coming from their fields so it’s imperative for us to come up with solutions to the climate crisis. I think our government, and our people in particular, will respond positively to this campaign.

JR: How are you mobilizing for the campaign? How is the movement being built?

TN: At the moment we are just using the fact that COP 17 is here. Everyone in South Africa is talking about climate change. There is this big meeting in Durban every a child, the taxi driver, the church man and woman, they want to know what’s going on? So we are using that. But some people feel overwhelmed. “If the climate changes there is nothing I can do, who am I?” Some would even say it’s God’s will, you know. Our campaign is trying to say, no, you can do something. You can take to the streets and march. You can campaign in your church, in your school to put pressure on the powers that be to actually create a million climate jobs. You can also do other things within your own community, for example, premaculture. Because there is going to be a crisis with food, so you can encourage people to plan gardens, or the government to release land so that we move away from agribusiness, you know big farms, owned by multinational corporations, they are high carbon emitters.

JR: So you are mobilizing the grassroots, what else are you doing?

TN: The second think we are doing is building alliances between community organizations. In South Africa we are lucky, we have a lot of community organizations, social movements, nongovernmental organizations involved in a variety of activities. We are trying to link up with the trade unions, with church movements, around climate change. We are using the COP 17 dynamic. But I think our campaign will really take off after COP 17, when we down to brass tacks, the nitty gritty, when we actually go to our government with clear proposals. We are also conducting research on generating energy from wind turbines and ocean wave technology. We are also thinking of public transport. So instead of people driving their cars, we can have low carbon buses and trains. Also housing, so that you build houses that don’t need a lot of artificial energy. These are all the things we are looking toward emphasizing as we move forward with our campaign.

JR: What do you think the movement for climate justice have to learn from South Africa’s liberation struggle?

TN: Well, in South Africa we were facing a formidable enemy. Apartheid was a fascist state with big guns. They were prepared to kill, they killed. They sent Nelson Mandela and many others to jail for many years. They were pushing people off 10 story buildings. It looked as if the people had no power. But through coming together, in particular through the international support we got from African Americans, workers in Germany, trade unions in the UK, from our brothers and sisters in the rest of Africa, we were able to build a formidable movement which was able to match and win against the apartheid monster. So, although climate change might seem such an overwhelming problem especially given the fact that the very system we live in—capitalism—is profit driven. It’s hard to convince a multinational corporation making money from oil to stop producing oil! But we can win through building solidarity, through raising awareness. The solution cannot come from the elites it can only come from the ground. And people must be made to feel they count, their action counts, what they say counts. That’s the inspiration we get from the apartheid movement. By coming together through solidarity we can win. You don’t have to fight alone. In fact, you can’t win alone. The only way is if we stand together.

JR: Do you have any special message for US readers?

TN: People in the U.S. firstly must think about Africa. Africa will suffer the most from the consequences of global warming and climate change. Secondly, the whole world is going to suffer. But when the suffering begins the people who suffer first are the poor, the working class. It’s important that we come up with ideas and a vision which puts the poor, the working class, the ordinary John or Mary in the street at the forefront of social change. That is our vision, people driven social change.

Thursday, November 24, 2011

U.S. Immigrant Rights Leaders Join Delegation to Migration Hearings and Action in Geneva


PRESS ADVISORY
November 23, 2011 

U.S. Immigrant Rights Leaders Join Delegation to Migration Hearings and Action in Geneva

Contact:
Monami Maulik, DRUM (347) 385-9113monami@drumnyc.org
Colin Rajah, National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights; crajah@nnirr.org

Queens, NY- Community leaders from DRUM- Desis Rising Up & Moving ( a South Asian low-income immigrant and workers rights organization), VAMOS Unidos (street vendor immigrant workers center) and United Methodist Women  in NY will join an international group of delegates from around the globe at the 6th annual Global Forum on Migration and Development (GFMD) and the People's Global Action (PGA) on Migration and Development in Geneva, Switzerland from November 29-December 2, 2011.  Longtime DRUM youth leader and organizer, Ayesha Mahmooda will join the People's Global Action to represent the issues faced by South Asian, Muslim and undocumented immigrants in the U.S.  DRUM's founder and Executive Director, Monami Maulik, is one of a handful of migrant leaders from the U.S. to attend the Civil Society Days meetings of the GFMD where governments meet to decide migration policy direction.  DRUM has been a leading U.S. participant in the important international GFMD process since 2005 by testifying and organizing with global migrant rights networks to pass global and domestic migration policy that is rooted in human rights and to end the further exploitation and abuse of migrants.

DRUM will join a delegation of over 20 migrant advocates from across the U.S. as part of the National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights and many more from across the globe as part of Migrant Rights International in Geneva for the week of activities.  Other U.S. organizations attending include the Black Alliance for Just Immigration Reform and the National Alliance of Latin American and Caribbean Communities. 

As Executive Director, Monami Maulik explains, "As a U.S. based migrant rights organization, we feel an urgent responsibility to advocate for just migration policies that protect human life over profits at the global level given the fact that the U.S. government is a major violator of migrants' human rights and exporter of anti-migrant policy to other countries. We will uplift the need to de-link 'National Security' from migrant policy because the U.S. example to the world in the last decade since 9/11 has been to confuse the two- leading to harsh and punitive anti-immigrant policies within the U.S. and around the globe like border militarization and deaths, detention without due process, racial profiling, and anti-Muslim initiatives across Europe and North America. " 

For more information, see:
People's Global Action:http://migrantwatch.org/pga2011/

People's Global Action 2011 
29 November – 2 December 
Geneva, Switzerland 

What is the PGA? 

The Peoples’ Global Action on Migration, Development and Human Rights (PGA) is an independent civil society event parallel to the Global Forum on Migration and Development (GFMD).  Over the past 5 years since the UN High Level Dialogue on Migration and Development (UNHLD) in 2006, civil society engagement around the GFMD has grown more vibrant.  Each year, hundreds and even thousands of civil society representatives and members of the general public have participated in the PGA’s parallel events while the official GFMD has taken place.  The 2010 PGA in Mexico City for instance, was attended by almost 500 delegates from around the world. 

The PGA brings together representatives from every region of the globe to share information, dialogue, strengthen analyses and develop joint positions on current and emerging issues related to migration.  The PGA also provides critical space for advocacy and lobbying government delegates and international institutions to look at migration from a human rights framework and to be accountable to international human rights and development commitments.  Furthermore, the PGA paves the way for capacity building and the establishment and broadening of international networks. 

Who organizes the PGA? 

The PGA is jointly organized by a broad coalition of local and international migrant 
associations, trade unions, human rights organizations, faith-based/religious groups, 
and other NGOs.  In 2011, the PGA’s international organizers include: 

 Migrants Rights International (MRI) including Migrant Forum in Asia (MFA), the 
National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (NNIRR), Platform for 
International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM), Comitato 
Antirazzista Durban Italia (CADI) etc.
 The International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), Building and 
Woodworkers International (BWI), and their affiliates 
 The Transnational Migrant Platform, and European Working Group (EWG) 

The PGA organizers are currently reaching out to local organizations in Geneva to be partners in co-organizing the 2011 PGA.  These local organizations include: 
 African Peace Network 
 Le Collectif de soutien aux sans-papiers de Genève 
 Geneva Forum for Pilipino Concerns (GFPC) 
 The Graduate Institute of Geneva 
 others… 

What is in store for the 2011 PGA in Geneva? 

As in previous years, the PGA will be held in conjunction with the annual GFMD (29 November – 2 December) in Geneva.  The primary theme for the 2011 PGA is “Undocumented Migrants – A Call for Regularisation”.  The 2011 PGA program will highlight the ongoing struggle against racism and xenophobia in Europe and around the world against migrants, and calls for equal rights and protections of all migrants regardless of status.

*

GLOBAL MIGRATION

United Methodist Delegation to Attend Migrant Rights Convention in Geneva, Switzerland

November 17, 2011
A General Board of Global Ministries delegation will attend the People’s Global Action on Migration, Development and Human Rights (PGA) in Geneva, Switzerland, November 28–December 2, 2011.

A delegation of 18 church representatives will attend the PGA as part of the mission agency’s focus on global migration and poverty. The PGA is a grass-roots event organized by Migrant Rights International that brings together migrant organizations from around the world. It is held in tandem with the intergovernmental Global Forum on Migration and Development and a related Civil Society Days. 

The General Board of Global Ministries (Global Ministries), including United Methodist Women, will bring a delegation representing Central and Southern Europe, Congo, Germany, Philippines and West Africa Central Conferences as well as representatives of the United Methodist Task Force on Immigration, staff, United Methodist missionaries, students, and a director of United Methodist Women.

The Global Ministries’ delegation to Geneva will seek to understand the migration realities faced by United Methodists and Methodists in diverse regions of the world, and, in collaboration with secular migrant organizations from Africa, Asia, Latin America, Europe and the United States, explore migrant experiences and migration policy. They will strengthen networks to promote global, regional and national policies that put migrant human rights at the center. They will consider how genuine sustainable development could create conditions in which the poor would be free to choose to stay and not be forced to migrate in search of livelihoods. Methodist delegates will consider how this global advocacy experience can strengthen their work at home with migrant sending congregations, receiving congregations and migrant congregations. 

This represents an ongoing commitment to global migration, linked to poverty. Global Migration is a model project of Global Ministries’ work on Ministry With the Poor, which links direct service and local ministries to national and global advocacy for just migration policy prioritizing human rights.

Building on The United Methodist Church's Resolution #6028, “Global Migration: The Quest for Justice” (from The Book of Resolutions, 2008), Global Ministries understands the upsurge in migration around the world to be the result of unequal distribution of resources and opportunities globally, reflected in poverty, underdevelopment, climate change and war, which push people to move.

At the same time, wealthy nations have eagerly sought migrant workers to fill gaps in their employment needs and lower costs through exploitative jobs while taking harsh measures to limit workers’ rights, freedom of movement, and better employment opportunities. Increasingly, these migrant workers around the world find barriers including racism, harsh enforcement policies and growing criminalization of migrants.

####

Wednesday, October 05, 2011

A Culture of Cruelty

From our friends at No More Deaths (Tucson, AZ)

Imagine this: you have been detained for deportation. You are dehydrated, but are denied adequate water. You are famished, but are given only crackers as the hours stretch into days. Your cell is overcrowded, dirty, and extremely hot. You need your medication, but it has been taken from you. You are separated from your spouse and have no idea where they are. You are forced to sign papers you do not fully understand, and arrive in an unfamiliar city in the dead of night, without your identification, your money, your cell phone, or your other personal belongings.

It happens every day.

Last week, No More Deaths released A Culture of Cruelty, our second report documenting the human rights abuses perpetrated against migrants in the custody of the U.S. Border Patrol. Nearly 13,000 people were interviewed over three years. They reported a staggering 30,000 incidents of abuse and mistreatment.

Sign the petition urging President Obama to end the Border Patrol’s culture of cruelty.

The Border Patrol has no legally binding standards regulating its treatment of those it detains. The types of abuse individuals have reported remain alarmingly consistent. A Culture of Cruelty found that:

  • 10% of interviewees reported some form of physical abuse.
  • Children were more likely to be denied water than adults.
  • Of 433 incidents in which emergency medical treatment or medication was needed, it was provided only 14% of the time.
  • Close to half of all interviewees reported overcrowded processing-center conditions, and temperatures maintained at extreme heat or extreme cold.
  • Of dozens of complaints filed on behalf of detainees with the Department of Homeland Security, zero have resulted in any concrete change in Border Patrol practice.
The Border Patrol’s culture of cruelty is a part of the pattern of racial profiling, family separation, and human rights violations that immigrant communities face all over the country. Whether it’s at the border, in a county with a 287(g) agreement, or in a state that has passed an SB 1070 copycat, it’s clear DHS can’t be trusted to monitor itself.

As a No More Deaths supporter, you already know the devastating impact of border militarization. Border Patrol abuse is one more piece of the deadly “deterrence” strategy that has ripped apart families for the past 20 years.

Help us bring an end to Border Patrol abuse and impunity:

Sign the petition to President Obama, calling on him to put an end to systemic misconduct. If you have an organizational affiliation, endorse the sign-on letter.

Share this video of people describing first-hand experiences of Border Patrol abuse.

Donate to help us get the report’s findings to as many people as possible. The Unitarian Universalist Association has committed to matching donations dollar for dollar, up to $4,000.
The full report, video interviews with people who have experienced abuse, and additional information about the campaign to end Border Patrol abuse can all be found at cultureofcruelty.org.

Thanks for all that you do in support of human rights in the borderlands.

No More Deaths

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Action Alert: Tell ICE to keep Buen Pastor families together!

Join SCSJ & NNIRR

Thursday, Sept. 29 -- National Call-in Day for Justice for Buen Pastor Congregation

Your help is needed NOW to fight the deportation of 22 members of the Buen Pastor congregation in North Carolina.

Last Thursday, 22 members of the Buen Pastor congregation had a hearing in Charlotte, North Carolina to fight their deportation. Immigration judge, Barry Pettinato, denied the motion to suppress evidence and terminate proceedings. He also denied a continuance to allow Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials to make a decision to drop the charges.

As a result, two members were given final deportation orders and seventeen members were given voluntary departure; the seventeen will need to pay voluntary departure bonds of $500 each within five business days. Three members who qualify for immigration relief will continue to have hearings in the Charlotte court. The congregation will appeal the decision with the Board of Immigration Appeals, which will put their removal dates on hold.

The process with the courts may take up to eighteen months, and the families face an uncertain future. However, ICE can take action NOW to drop the case. Over 800 people across the country have already signed the petition urging ICE to drop all charges and dismiss the case -- but after a month and a half, ICE has not responded.

Join us in a National Call-In Day on Thursday, Sept. 29, to ICE Secretary John Morton. Please tell him to keep these families together, and drop all charges in the case of the Buen Pastor congregation.
Call ICE Today!
Dial (800) 394-5855 and tell them:

Hello, I am calling from ______________________ to urge John Morton to drop the charges against all the families involved in the Buen Pastor congregation case in which 22 men, women, and children are facing deportation. Over 800 individuals have signed a petition asking for him to drop the deportation proceedings for this case but have not received a response.

• John Morton has the power to take action today to drop charges.


• Members of Buen Pastor are exactly the kind of individuals who should benefit from President Obama’s August 18th announcement that DHS should use discretion to close cases of individuals who are positive influences on our communities, and who furthermore, are victims of civil rights abuses.


• The church members have filed a complaint and now have an open investigation with the DHS office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties for rights violations including racial profiling, denied access to interpreters, denied access to legal counsel, and threats to take away their children.

Join us in raising our voices to bring real justice for these families. Thank you for your time.





Tell us how the call went by filling out a brief survey.

Then forward this e-mail to three friends and ask them to make a call.


To read more about the Buen Pastor case, click here and here.

Recent news coverage of the 9/22 hearing in Charlotte, NC:

News 14, "Immigrants await status in Immigration Court."

Kansas City Star, "Judge rules immigrant church members stopped by border agents must leave U.S."

Charlotte Observer, "Judge orders immigrants removed from church."

News clip on local tv station:

WSOCTV.com, "Members of church group fighting deportation."

.

*Photo credit: Jorge Hernandez-Calderon